🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.